Back in April, I blogged about the
new challenges that accompany new home security technology, specifically the fact that cameras can inadvertently capture domestic details that you'd rather not communicate to outside parties, including law enforcement.
:-)
But they also sometimes capture evidence that has
nothing to do with safeguarding your home against burglary, but which is highly instructive and useful nevertheless.
Current case in point: a courier service claims to have delivered a rather expensive package to us on a specific date, at a specific time, as evidenced by their tracking software. But we never received the package. And most tellingly, our exterior surveillance system reveals that no courier truck of any kind came down our street in the time period two hours on either side of the alleged delivery scan.
Curiouser and curiouser, eh? Not only that, the courier
SOMEHOW has on record that "a woman" was at the home during delivery and accepted the package personally. This information despite the fact that there's apparently no associated delivery signature.
Ordinarily, I might concede that my brain is fallible and perhaps during the chaos of a working-from-home day, I accepted a package and misplaced it, assuming it was just a new toner cartridge or something.
But unlike my brain (but similar to my
Dash Cam), the hidden wide-angle lens tells no lies, makes no mistakes. And the evidence suggests that either the courier accidentally delivered to the wrong street, or some courier employee forged the scan and got a
five-finger discount on a high-end consumer item.
Either way, our security system may have just effectively paid for part of itself because, as we proceed with our dispute, it's not just our feeble consumer word against the mighty international package tracking software empire.
We have the proverbial tape.
|
Big Sister is watching,
from a variety of undisclosed locations. |