|I am unless I have activities planned, because vacations have the potential to bore me, indeed. I'm not a fan of passive entertainment.|
I'm sorry for the term which I did not originate, and I don't find name-calling to be appropriate in most situations, but I have heard so many people refer to Council as "a bunch of conservative dittoheads" that by this time, the phrase is almost de rigueur.
Jason Long has some questionable history - I get that. It's been well-expounded in the press. Normally I would not even remotely endorse a candidate with his record. But when I look at the big picture alternatives, I don't like what I see. So, the rest of Council doesn't like J. Long, as they made clear with their mailer. Is that really so bad in this context? Who is going to be the counterweight, the whistle-blower, the check-and-balance, if the rest of them are all buddy-buddy?
Are you a conservative? Good for you. Now, engage your should-be-truly-conservative brain and remember that this is government we are talking about here. I don't care what kind of label people are wearing - if they are uniformly buddy-buddy, the net result is frequently baddy-baddy. Don't be the fool to assume that just because every candidate happens to be wearing your favorite label, that this has no potential to occur. History doesn't prove it out.
As usual, the choices would seem to be less than ideal. Maybe I should stick to that other blog I've been working on.
|This is an oversimplification because it assumes there are good choices, but we should keep voting regardless, just to remain within the bounds of civic duty.|